IN THIS LESSON
Kant thought he had cracked the code of morality: a test that reveals whether what you do is morally permissible.
Topics Discussed
Review of Kant’s metaphysics, freedom, and the relationship between morality and rational agency
Deontology versus consequentialism
Hypothetical and categorical imperatives
Kant’s Universal Law Formulation and how to test a maxim through universalization
Perfect and imperfect duties, including duties to oneself and duties to others
Kant’s Humanity Formulation and the requirement to treat rational persons as ends rather than merely as means
Whether the Universal Law and Humanity formulations always generate the same moral conclusions
Kant’s broader philosophical system, including the highest good and the practical postulates of freedom, God, and immortality
Kant’s place within the Enlightenment and some criticisms of his views
Glossary
Kant’s Philosophical Framework
Metaphysics — The branch of philosophy concerned with the fundamental nature of reality: what exists and what reality is ultimately like.
Phenomenal Realm — Reality as it appears to us through experience.
Noumenal Realm — Reality as it is in itself, independently of how it appears to us. Kant argues that we cannot directly know things as they are in themselves.
Pure Reason — Reason operating independently of particular sensory experiences.
Synthetic A Priori Judgment — A claim that adds substantive information while being knowable independently of particular experiences. Kant thinks some necessary truths about experience and morality have this status.
Freedom — For Kant, a necessary condition of morality. Although we cannot theoretically prove that we are free, moral deliberation requires us to regard ourselves as capable of choosing whether to obey the moral law.
The Foundations of Kantian Ethics
Deontology — A moral approach that evaluates actions according to the principles or duties that guide them rather than merely by their consequences.
Consequentialism — A moral approach that evaluates actions according to the consequences they produce.
Rational Being — A being capable of governing its behavior according to principles rather than simply following instinct or desire.
Moral Law — The universal principles that reason requires rational beings to follow.
Hypothetical Imperative — A conditional command: If you want a particular outcome, then take the action needed to achieve it.
Categorical Imperative — An unconditional command of reason that applies regardless of what you happen to want.
Moral Worth — The special moral value an action has when it is done from duty—because the person respects the moral law, rather than merely acting from self-interest, emotion, or inclination.
Testing Actions with the Categorical Imperative
Maxim — The principle that expresses what you intend to do and why you intend to do it.
Universal Law Formulation — Kant’s instruction to act only on maxims that you could consistently will to become universal laws.
Universalization — Imagining everyone acting according to the same maxim you are considering.
Contradiction — A failure that occurs when universalizing a maxim would undermine the very action, practice, or institution that the maxim depends upon.
Perfect Duty — A strict duty produced when the relevant maxim cannot be consistently universalized. Kant’s examples include prohibitions against false promises and suicide.
Imperfect Duty — A genuine moral obligation that allows flexibility in when and how it is fulfilled, such as developing your talents or helping others.
Duty to Self — An obligation concerning how you treat your own rational nature, dignity, or capacities.
Duty to Others — An obligation concerning how you treat other rational beings.
Respecting Persons
Humanity Formulation — Kant’s command to treat humanity, whether in yourself or another person, always as an end and never merely as a means.
Means — Something used to achieve another goal.
End — Something valued for its own sake rather than simply as a tool for achieving something else.
Treating Someone Merely as a Means — Using another person for your own purposes without adequately respecting that person’s autonomy, choices, dignity, or rational ends.
Dignity — The special moral status Kant associates with rational persons, who must not be treated as mere objects or instruments.
Kant’s Larger Moral Worldview
Highest Good — Kant’s ideal of a condition in which complete moral virtue and happiness are ultimately brought into harmony.
Postulate of Practical Reason — Something that cannot be theoretically proven but that Kant argues we are rationally justified in assuming for practical moral purposes.
Immortality of the Soul — A postulate Kant connects with the idea of indefinite moral progress toward complete virtue.
God — A practical postulate that Kant connects with the possibility that virtue and happiness can ultimately be brought into harmony.
Republicanism — Kant’s political ideal of government by laws compatible with the freedom and equality of citizens rather than hereditary monarchical rule.
Universal Hospitality — Kant’s principle that people should be able to approach and interact peacefully across political borders without automatically being treated as enemies.
For other questions…
Focus Questions
How does Kant connect freedom, rationality, and moral responsibility?
What distinguishes deontology from consequentialism, and why does Kant reject consequences as the ultimate basis of morality?
How does the Universal Law Formulation test a maxim, and what makes a universalized maxim contradictory?
What is the difference between perfect and imperfect duties, and how can each involve duties to ourselves as well as duties to others?
How does the Humanity Formulation differ from the Universal Law Formulation, and why might philosophers question whether the two always produce the same conclusions?
How does Kant’s larger philosophical system connect morality with freedom, the highest good, God, and immortality?
In what way is Kant a hero of the Enlightenment? In what way is Kant (inadvertently) a counter-Enlightenment philosopher?
Why might critics regard Kantian morality as too rigid?
Reading List
Will Dudley, Understanding German Idealism.
William Egginton, The Rigor of Angels: Borges, Heisenberg, Kant, and the Ultimate Nature of Reality.
Barbara Herman, The Practice of Moral Judgment.
Jonathan I. Israel, Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750.
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason.
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason.
Immanuel Kant, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.
Immanuel Kant, Lectures on Ethics.
Pauline Kleingeld, Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race.
Christine Korsgaard, Creating the Kingdom of Ends.
Alasdair MacIntyre, A Short History of Ethics: A History of Moral Philosophy from the Homeric Age to the Twentieth Century (2e).
Richie Robertson, The Enlightenment: The Pursuit of Happiness, 1680-1790.
Roger Scruton, Kant: A Very Short Introduction.
Andrea Wulf, Magnificent Rebels: The First Romantics and the Invention of the Self.
Andrea Wulf, The Traveler: One Man's Quest for Humanity from the South Seas to Revolutionary Paris.